The 7th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, Earl’s Regency Hotel, Kandy, Sri Lanka from 16th to 18th December 2016


Vathsala Somachandra 1*

Faculty of Construction, International College of Business & Technology, Colombo, Sri Lanka

*E-Mail: ivathsala @, TP: +940771120795

Abstract: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is more significant criteria for any kind of business entity, especially which has significant impact towards the natural as well as built environment. Therefore do the right thing and do it in a right way is much more important for the wellbeing of the particular business and the affecting parties from that business as well.

Since the impact of construction industry towards the economy, environment and society is significant than the other industries, it is important to have a systematic approach to ensure the Corporate Social Responsibility. When

turning into Sri Lanka, presently Construction Industry risen up with the awaken development of the country. Thus the need of realistic CSR performance evaluating system which fits with the Sri Lankan construction industry to develop the sustainability is becoming a critical issue that should address with care. Even though there are several CSR indicator systems available for worldwide their possibility of adapting to Sri Lankan construction industry, in a

practical and realistic manner, had not yet verified. Therefore through this paper, it was aimed to identify the

criticality of CSR performance factors in Sri Lankan construction sector.

Comprehensive literature review had been carried out to investigate the available CSR performance factors to the construction industry in worldwide. Through a detailed questionnaire survey, industry experts’ opinion for applicability and criticality of the obtained CSR performance factors relevant to Sri Lankan construction industry had been verified. Among twenty nine CSR performance factors under eight key stakeholders’ twenty four critical factors were identified.

Through this research it will provide guidance for the CSR implementation and will be provide a scientific performance evaluation guideline to assess the construction enterprises attainment towards the sustainable development.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Indicator System; Construction Industry; Sri Lanka.

1. Introduction

On the path to achieve corporate sustainability the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was universally identified as an emerging component which encompasses corporate sustainability expression with business operations. Elkington (1998) discussing more into detail when arguing that companies should not only focus on enhancing its value through maximizing profit and outcome but concentrate on environmental and social issues equally.

Currently there is neither a universally agreed definition of CSR nor a commonly accepted

explanation of what exactly it relates to (Heijden et al., 2010). Many international organizations had

defined CSR as follows. CSR is defined in the ISO26000 as: “the responsibility of an organization for the impacts of its decisions and activities on

society and the environment, through transparent

and ethical behaviour” (ISO, 2010). Business for

Social Responsibility (BSR) defines CSR as “the

business operations meet or exceed social

expectations of industrial and commercial institutions in the ethical, legal, commercial and public areas” (BSR, 2008). CSR is defined by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) as “corporate commitment to contribute to sustainable economic development, employees and their families, local communities and the whole society in order to improve their quality of life” (WBCSD, 2000). According to Zhen et al, 2012 the basic idea of CSR is to focus at how business integrates stakeholders’ interests and social values, to combine the relation between organization and society. To achieve that CSR considers the economic, social and environmental performance of the organization itself.

2. Overview to CSR Status in Construction


It has been documented that the construction industry makes a significant contribution to the national economy with the industry encircling a

range of businesses including constructors, clients, material producers, professional services and construction enterprises, amongst others. The ongoing progress and expansion of construction enterprises, however, is ever more associated with a number of sustainable development challenges, involving various economic, environmental and social issues (Shenet al, 2010).

Through the social viewpoint, the construction industry is a critical element of the labour market

and contributes to generate high numbers of

employment opportunities, although it is a high- risk occupation, it has been reported that poor

occupational safety is associated with enormous

economic losses in construction enterprises in some countries. Statistics shows that fatal accidents to workers in construction companies are generally much higher than in any other industry where falls from height and the management of site transport and equipment are the main causes of fatalities (Joneset al, 2006). For illustration, research conducted in UK by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has reported that construction site loss due to occupational accidents and health damage (including schedule delays, absenteeism, the loss of health and insurance costs, etc.) accounts for approximately 8.5% of project costs (Qu, 2007).

Presently the construction industry has often criticized for having little regard for the

environment, for being provoking with its clients

and for being insensitive and hard-hearted toward the society (Barthorpe, 2010). The Construction Industry typically is associated with the consumption of large amounts of resources and energy. Research proves that over 50% of raw materials which are obtained from nature were used to construct various types of buildings and their auxiliary apparatus, and these buildings consume more than 40% of global energy in construction and operation (WBCSD, 2009). It was broadly reported that construction activities have significant adverse impacts towards the environment which typically comprise dust and gas emission, noise pollution, waste generation, misuse of water, land misuse and pollution (Tam et al.,

2006; Wu, 2008). Though considerable number of organizations have implemented international environmental management standard (EMS) ISO

14000 to improve their environmental performance, nevertheless, numerous construction

enterprises have not shown, what might be considered, commensurate concern about the

environmental issues (Tam et al., 2006; Turk,


As argued by Wu, 2008 the wastage of resources are still quite common in construction processes, and the efficiency of resource utilization is comparatively low in developing countries. For example, in the UK, 420 million tonnes of resources used in construction industry per year, and wastage rate is 10%. Whereas, in China, water consumption is 30 percent higher than the developed countries, steel consumption 10-25 percent higher, and cement usage is 80 kg more per cubic meters on average during construction. The construction industry contributes to 40% of total amount of waste in China, reaching 300 million tonnes in 2010 (Wang et al, 2010). The existing building stock accounts for 30% of total energy consumption and 25% of greenhouse gas emission in China (CCIA, 2010; CHI, 2010).

Due to aforementioned significant adverse impacts

Construction ventures have become increasingly targeted by governments and environmentalists to

manage their performance based on new societal

demands driven by the goals of sustainable development (Teo and Loosemore, 2003). Moreover, currently, the competition in construction markets is becoming ever more intensive (Zhao et al, 2009a). Therefore, with rising heights of competition, construction companies are considering CSR as a means to boost their corporate image and to achieve a competitive advantage. In the construction industry, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is increasingly valued as one factor that will contribute to business sustainable development. Even though, construction enterprises typically develop CSR reports as one way to maintain a positive corporate image. There is a growing body of research which considers the effectiveness of CSR. However, understanding what CSR means to the construction industry, and how to practice it, is limited. (Zhen et al., 2012).

3. Overview to Sri Lankan Construction


According to the statistics from Central Bank of Sri Lanka 25.6% growth rate can be seen in the Construction Sector in the year 2013(b) (Economic and Social Statistics of Sri Lanka, 2014). Statistics from the Central Bank of Sri Lanka indicate that the Sri Lankan construction industry has contributed 6%–8% of the GDP on average during the last decade whereas a similar situation is observed for construction investment. On average, construction investment in Sri Lanka during the last decade accounted for 16% of the GDP (Ramachandra et al, 2013).

As of 2009, the direct employment in the construction industry was 562,000 persons. This included four categories of employees: professional, technical, crafts, and machine operators. Almost 97 percent of total persons employed were males with 75 percent falling in the

25-45 age – group. 52per cent were with experience of less than five years. In Sri Lanka,

employment in the construction industry has

experienced an increase of 40 percent during the years 2005 to 2009 as compared to15.3 percent increase in total employment (Industry Report on Sri Lanka, 2011).

The key entities that undertake construction work are registered contractors of the Institute of

5. Discussion

Through the literature survey eight key stake holders were identified as employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers and partners, environment and resources, local community, government and competitors. Environment and resource is not considered as a stakeholder, but it will be treated as an agency to stimulate the changes in the construction industry moving to socially responsible practice. Twenty Nine CSR performance factors were identified under the above identified key stake holders. Those are listed in the Table 1 along with the T-test value and RII.

Construction Training & Development (ICTAD),

international contractors, and unregistered informal

P Val ue

Signifi cance

RII Rank

contractors (Industry Report on Sri Lanka, 2011). 0.99 0.0104 0.92 2
Several awards are issuing through Construction

Industry Development Authority (CIDA) like

Construction Performance for Civil Engineering 0.99 0.0098 0.85 5

Projects, Green Construction Award and Award for

Construction Excellence. But for any of the

awarding criteria they are not consider about the 0.98 0.0179 0.88 3
CSR performances of that particular construction 0.99 0.0101 0.84 6
0.98 0.0179 0.69 8
4. Research Design
0.96 0.0380 0.71 7
Research was designed to identify its objectives
through an industry-wide questionnaire survey.
The survey sample was selected randomly (using 0.99 0.0109 0.93 1
simple sampling methods). The contact list of
0.99 0.0078 0.87 1
Quantity Surveyors) was obtained from the yellow 0.98 0.0198 0.81 2
pages of the telephone directory and from
respective professional institutions. Opinion survey
had carried out with fifteen experts in the industry
0.92 0.0827 0.76 4
the construction field, in order to identify the key 0.99 0.0066 0.79 3
CSR issues that needs close concentration for Sri

0.99 0.0078 0.87 4

leading consultants (Architects, Engineers and

who are having more than five years’ experience in

The questionnaire was developed into two sections.

In section one, the profile of the respondent was



Employ ees

Shareho lders

Custom ers

CSR Performance


Occupational health and safety of employees

Legal Working

hours and rest time

Wages and welfare

Staff Employment

Education and training

Freedom of

association and bargaining

Harmonious labor/management relationship

Human rights

measures Shareholder legal revenues

Accurate disclosure

of corporate status and development


Decision-making participation


relationship management


Quality and safety of construction product


satisfaction Customer service culture

Innovation and


Disclosure of true performance information of the company

Supplie r & Partner Maintain an


partner relationship

0.99 0.0109 0.93 1
0.99 0.0080 0.84 3

identified. In section two, criticality of the CSR

performance issues related to Sri Lankan

Relative Importance Index (RII) were used as the

construction industry was identified. A five point

“likert” scale where 1 presents “Not critical at all”,

3 indicate “Neutral” and 5 present “Very critical”

0.98 0.0179 0.88 2
0.99 0.0080 0.76 4
was used to solicit the judgments. Mean ranking method, standard deviation and T-Test and 0.99 0.0080 0.84 3
descriptive statistical tools in this research study.
0.98 0.0179 0.88 1

0.98 0.0179 0.88 1

Govern ment Enhance

communication with


Promote CSR


of partners and suppliers

Pay tax

Obey the


of laws and policy

Provide employment opportunities

Environ ment & Resourc es Conservation of


and resources

Environment protection

Commu nity Project impact on


Build harmonious community

Compet itors Operation ethically

Fair competition

management relationship and freedom of association and bargaining is again important

factors which contributes for the betterment of the

0.98 0.0198 0.81 2

construction industry.

Shareholders –Shareholders are type of off-site stake holders. It is the duty of that particular

0.99 0.0104 2 1

construction firm to maintain and generate profits

0.99 0.0099 0.88 2

0.99 0.0078 0.87 3

in order to maximise the shareholders’ profits. Therefore it was identified as the first important factor ‘Shareholders legal revenue’. Providing proper disclosure regarding the firm’s financial

performance and the sustainability performance for

0.99 0.0109 0.93 2

0.99 0.0148 0.96 1

the shareholders’ was identified as the second important factor since accountability and transparency are key factors in business world.

Proper relationship management is again raised as

0.99 0.0104 0.92 1

0.98 0.0179 0.88 2

0.99 0.0109 0.93 1

0.99 0.0109 0.93 1

Employees – It is a common truth that construction industry is one of the main category which provides direct employment to a large number of people in Sri Lanka and due to that

‘employees’ become one of the most important stakeholder in the construction industry. Almost everyone is likely to be interested in enjoying their rights. During the survey it was came into light that major concern of the experts were raised up into first place ‘Human Rights’. Due to the complexity of the industry it is important to keep the focus to ensure human rights while achieving project goals. No point of achieving senseless project goals while beating down its employees. Since the risk of the construction industry is very high, occupational health and safety of employees had been identified as the second leading CSR performance factor. Meantime it was identified ‘Staff Employment’ as the third important CSR performance factor for Sri Lankan construction industry. Social justice which is featured with liberty, equality and fairness, is a key component in CSR (Godfrey and Hatch, 2007). Wages and welfare had raised into fourth place where legal working hours and rest time raised into fifth place. Standard wage criteria, proper welfare facilities, legal working hours and standard rest times should be implemented in order to make a healthy working environment in the construction industry. Availability of avenues for career development is another important factor that employees look into. Harmonious labour –

third important factor since being responsible for them is important. Shareholders participation in

decision making process of firm’s corporate

activities and in major decisions identified as the fourth critical factor in related to the Sri Lankan

construction industry.

Customers – Client is the main customer of construction industry. The way that a firm treat to its clients is one of the main measure that deviate from its competitors. On the other hand it will influence greatly to sustain in the industry.

‘Quality and safety of construction project’ had been identified as the first ranked CSR performance factor since quality and safety of the project is always adding value for the clients’ investment. Level of service that the firm supply even after the construction of the project is another most important factor since the client is very much keen on the construction maintenance and post construction service. Quality of the project, safety of the project, level of customer service, innovation and development of new concepts and disclosure of true performance information has a direct influence for the customer satisfaction.

Suppliers and partners – Creating a sound supply chain relationship is a must in the construction industry. For that maintaining appropriate partner relationship and enhancing the communication is equally important. According to respondents it was identified both those factors with equal importance.

‘Promote CSR performance of partners and suppliers’ is generally understood as integral to

develop CSR since there is a pressure to ensure

that suppliers’ and partners’ are meeting their social, environmental responsibilities.

country’s GDP it is utmost important to maintain the integrity towards the government. Paying required tax payments according to the legislatives,

Government – Since the construction industry of Maintain an appropriate 0.880 4
Sri Lanka is one of the main contributor for the partner relationship

abide by laws and provide as much as employment

Enhance communication with partners/supplier Obey the requirements

of laws and policy

0.880 4

0.880 4

opportunities is integral to develop that integrity.

Environment and Resources – Construction Shareholder legal revenues 0.867 5
activities have significant impacts on both the

natural and the built environment through energy

Provide employment opportunities 0.867 5

Build harmonious community 0.880 4

Wages and welfare 0.867 5

and resource use and extraction, the production of waste materials, pollution, impacts on the

Legal Working hours and rest time

0.853 6

landscape and the creation of new buildings and infrastructure (Shen et al, 2007). Since

Education and training 0.840 7

Customer satisfaction 0.840 7

construction industry and its activities having a

direct impact towards the environment, environment protection and conservation of energy and resources are inherent factors in a CSR agenda.

Community – When consider about the impacts of a construction project for the community, main two communities can be identified. Those are local communities in which the project located and future communities created by construction project. When carrying out a project it is must to

Disclosure of true performance information of the company

Accurate disclosure of corporate status and development


Promote CSR performance of partners and suppliers

Shareholder relationship management system Decision-making participation

0.840 7

0.813 8

0.813 8

0.787 9

0.760 10

taking into account the community environmental

Innovation and development 0.760 10

protection. Meantime it is again important to consider about the community development in order to build harmonious community.

Harmonious labor/management


Freedom of association and bargaining

0.707 11

0.693 12

Competitors – Competitors also stakeholders of a construction company. Operate and behave in an ethical manner respecting the rights and dignity of other individuals is utmost important to create good market condition. Respondents also given an equal importance to ethical operation and fair competition.

CSR Performance Factor RII Rank

Environment protection 0.960 1 competition’ had identified as the second critical
Human rights measures 0.933 2 factor. ‘Occupational health and safety of
Quality and safety of construction product 0.933 2 employees’, ‘Pay tax’, ‘Project impact on

community’ had been identified as third critical

Conservation of energy 0.933 2 factor where ‘Staff Employment’, ‘Customer
and resources service culture’, ‘Maintain an appropriate
Operation ethically 0.933 2 partner relationship’, ‘Enhance communication
Fair competition 0.933 2 with partners/supplier’, ‘Obey the requirements of
Occupational health and safety of employees 0.920 3 laws and policy’, ‘Build harmonious community’

laid in the fourth criticality rank. ‘Wages and

Pay tax 0.920 3 welfare’, ‘Shareholder legal revenues’, ‘Provide
Project impact on community 0.920 3 employment opportunities’ ranked in the fifth

critical level where ‘Legal Working hours and rest

Staff Employment 0.880 4 time’ laid in sixth rank. ‘Education and training’,
Customer service culture 0.880 4 ‘Customer satisfaction’, ‘Disclosure of true

When consider about the total ranking of CSR performance factors during the opinion survey, total twenty nine factors were ranked only for twelve ranking positions. Among all these factors

‘Environmental Protection’ is identified as the top critical factor. ‘Human rights measures’, ‘Quality and safety of construction product’, ‘Conservation of energy and resources’, ‘Operation ethically’, ‘Fair

performance information of the company’ were ranked as seventh critical factor where ‘Accurate disclosure of corporate status and development prospects’, ‘Promote CSR performance of partners and suppliers’ were ranked in eighth critical factor. ‘Shareholder relationship management system’ ranked in ninth level where


participation’, ‘Innovation and development’ tenth level. ‘Harmonious labour/management

relationship’ laid in eleventh rank where ‘Freedom

of association and bargaining’ laid in the twelfth


6. Conclusion

The research revealed that, the criticality of corporate social responsibility performance factors with regards to the Sri Lankan construction industry. Twenty Nine factors were tested and among them Twenty Four factors are shown as significant to Sri Lankan construction industry, which means that those Twenty Four factors having a great impact towards developing CSR performance in Sri Lankan construction industry. These factors were identified under eight stakeholders including employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers and partners, government, environment and resources, community and competitors. Further, these findings will create a new avenue for those who interest in developing a framework for corporate social responsibility in Sri Lankan construction industry.


This research is accomplished to be indebted much dedication and admiration of many people who have contributed in numerous ways. I express my gratitude to each and every individual for their encouragement, values and ideas, assistance and specially their commitment towards this research to make it a success.

It is my foremost duty to pay my gratitude to Professor Ranjith Dissanayake, and my heartfelt thanks goes to Ms. Kamani Sylva for their endless support and encouragement.


1. Barthorpe, S., 2010. Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Property Management, 28 (1), 4-17.

2. Business for Social Responsibility (2015).

Corporate Social Responsibility. Available from

insights/case-studies [Accessed 15

February 2016].

3. CCIA, 2010. Media Press on Energy

Efficiency and Emission Reduction in the

Construction Sector. Chinese Construction

Industry Association, Beijing, China.

4. Economic and Social Statistics of Sri

Lanka, 2014

5. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks.

The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st

Century. Capstone Publishing, Oxford

6. Heijden, V.D.A., Driessen, P.P.J., Cramer, J.M., 2010. Making sense of corporate social responsibility: exploring organizational processes and strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (18),


7. ICRA Management Consulting Services

Limited, 2011. Industry Report Sri Lanka.

8. ISO, November 2010. ISO 26000 – Guidance on Social Responsibility. The

International Organization for

Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

9. Jones, P., Comfort, D., Hillier, D., 2006.

Corporate social responsibility and the UK

construction industry. Journal of Corporate

Real Estate. 8 (3), 134-150.

10. Qu, Y., 2007. CSR research about construction enterprises. Construction

Economy. 7, 94-96 (in Chinese).

11. Ramachandra, T., Rotimi, J.O.B., Rameezdeen, R., Direction of the Causal

Relationship between Construction and the

National Economy of Sri Lanka. Journal of

Construction in Developing Countries,

18(2), 49–63, 2013.

12. Shen, L.Y., Tam, V.W.Y., Tam, L., Ji, Y.B., 2010. Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (3), 254-259.

13. Tam, V.W.Y., Tam, C.M., Zeng, S.X., Chan, K.K., 2006. Environmental

performance measurement indicators in

construction. Building and Environment 41 (2), 164-173.

14. Teo, M., Loosemore, M., March 2003.

Changing the environmental culture of the construction industry. In: Molenaar, K.R., Chinowsky, P.S. (Eds.), Construction Research Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 19-21.

15. Turk, A.M., 2009. The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. Journal of Cleaner Production. 17 (5), 559-569.

16. Wang, J.Y., Yuan, H.P., Kang, X.P., Lu, W.S., 2010. Critical success factors for on- site sorting of construction waste: a China study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 54 (11), 931-936.

17. WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development), 2000. Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. WBCSD, Geneva.

18. WBCSD (World Business Council for

Sustainable Development), August 2009. Transforming the Market: Energy Efficiency in Buildings. WBCSD.

19. Wu, H.J., 2008. Construct Green Building and Promote Sustainable Development in

Construction Industry. Engineering 22,

29e30 (In Chinese).

20. Zhao, Z.Y., Shen, L.Y., Zuo, J., 2009a.

Performance and strategy of Chinese contractors in the international market.

Journal of Construction Engineering and

Management, 135 (2), 108-118.

21. Zhen Y. Z, Xiao J. Z., Kathryn D., & Jian Z. (2012). A corporate social responsibility indicator system for construction enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production,

29-30, 277-289.

ICBT Campus